All ye who Google today, mark the silhouette of, in the man's own words, 'the only private consulting detective' in the world. Holmes, with pipe and footprints for company, on the home page. It is his maker's anniversary. I pause, I must keep work aside. Before those pipettes and burettes, that pound of shag tobacco, before the idle scraping of fiddle on violin in a cold-blooded arm crowded with needle-marks, insurance and healthcare can wait.
Mark the elegance of the pipe. One already sees a grimy, freezing morning, with the horse-carts clopping on the cobblestone, and dim fat lamps failing in the fog, and the shuffling of gumboots and the wheezing of frock-coats in the corridor, and somewhere in a maze of unfriendly faces is a ragged consumptive man sharpening his blade, a respectable gentleman nervously oiling his revolver, waiting for the right time...
How could I describe the magic of all that, for a boy in Bangalore, all of twelve or thirteen, in a house of Kannada, rice and rasam? There was magic in every sentence. Fog. Snow. The knocker on a door. Scotland Yard. Watson's heavy walking stick. The Jezail bullet which pierced his shoulder. London, 'that cesspool of idlers and loungers'. Names like Drebber, Stangerson. Lestrade, lean and ferret-like, defeated again. Tobais Gregson sidling beside him. Holmes sniffing like a hound, pausing at taper, footmark, dust and ash. Salt Lake City, the unswerving arm of vengeance across the Atlantic and into the heart of London. There was magic in hats, in heavy coats, in leaving them on a hook when you entered a room. My uncle had a auburn cowboy hat someone gifted him, and I'd wear it on the sly, and then my grandfather's mocha raincoat and half of it trailing behind me, wading in murder, eyeing the cobwebs above, the sheddings of a broom, my grandmother's bangles, my grandfather's razor...
The first serious book I ever read (after some years of Enid Blyton's lemonade and pastry) was A Study in Scarlet, which remains, in my humble opinion, the finest Holmes novel and the finest thriller. What in the world could match the drips of Holmes's titrations, what could be more heart-thumping than setting out in a cab in the depths of the night with Watson and Holmes? Not food, not school, and at thirteen certainly not girls. Everytime I return to it, there's a steady thrill in my mind when Watson throws down that article with 'What ineffable twaddle!...I would lay ten to one against him', and Holmes's nonchalant response, 'You would lose your money. As for the article, I wrote it myself'. You can read it a thousand times, and it only gets better, the journey from dreary lodgings in London to the reddening of a lover's eyes in Utah's aridity, and back, to the story of poisoned pills, to justice for the wronging dead, and fetters for the savage lover. When you close the book, your blood is sluggish, and you move as if in water.
Of course, one could argue that the overwhelming emphasis on objectivity, on clinical methods and logical sequences of thought, are among the drawbacks of Doyle's Holmes-works, because very little of our universe can be described in the linear, objective paradigm. But that was the prevailing paradigm, and I'm prepared to let this one go as a reader, to believe in the sanctity of the empirical, in cases being spokes in one large wheel of crime. And with that, to let the moods and colours and noises confront me, boats on the Thames, the greasy arms that washed a blade, the carbuncle in a goose's gullet...
Great works stay forever, they are filled with bridges and doors, they move with ease from the 19th century to the 21st, from a Boer War veteran to a Kendriya Vidyalaya student, from London to Bangalore, 221 B Baker Street to 57th Cross Rajajinagar. And while so much is in common, while stories of love and greed and revenge and justice will find listeners everywhere, it is the magic you find in settings different from yours that make your eyes gleam like pearls while you read. It's the same, for me, with Dostoevsky's Russia, Bandhopadhyay's Bengal and Maugham's islands in the Pacific. There's beauty and nostalgia in the familiar, and intrigue in the unfamiliar, and a wavering immortality in the threshold between them.
Allow me to add, also, that the Bantam edition of Holmes, with the photograph of a dull, cold cobblestone street with a scatter of hat-wearing silhouetted men on its dark-coffee cover, is the edition, and it's in two volumes. I have consistently been intolerant of any other Holmes, how ridiculous and ersatz the others seem. It's been a while, though. I lost my childhood volumes and bought another set last month on the footpath between Churchgate and Victoria Terminus in Mumbai. So if you want a set and you're in Mumbai, you know where to head.
Look for an old, frayed copy with musty pages. Find yourself a solitary lamplit room. If you have Handel, play Handel. And open the doors...

31 comments:
My tribute to Doyle:
Hounds of Baskerville was my first;
since then every Holmes was a must!
'Elementary' or otherwise...
humanity microscopically had he seen
What a maker that Doyle must have been!
hey, i just stumbled upon you blog while trying to kill time. and what a fab read it has been since. there was a particular entry about the keyboard which i loved the best. your words make for a brilliant break in a usually muddled up day. keep posting!
@ id it is
aye! what a maker indeed.
@ bjkdy
Thanks so much for the beautiful note. There used to be a man who shuffled from here to there around 57th cross, kicking things on the street, a man whose lower jaw protruded in a smile. I wonder if he's still there.
@ Neha
I'm glad you liked it. I've never been sure if I should blog at all, since few people seem interested in what interests me, and I don't write about burning issues or offer tips on cracking the CAT. So it's really nice to get notes from people like you. Thanks. I like your blog too, I find it intriguing and yet friendly, and the one-line questions are... koans.
hey, may be that's why i liked your posts. no burning issues,no preaching, no gyan. that's kind of hard to get these days. it's also a gentle reminder,i think, to the fact that there is life beyond being salaried. and it's the simple things like chai, cricket and a book on a rainy day that get you to heaven. as i said before, keep posting, there are people reading :)
Came here from Desipundit....Lovely post! Very few things beat the pleasure of reading Holmes....I started off reading the novels and while Study in Scarlet and Valley of Fear grew on me, nothing beat Sign of Four or Hound (which I think is the best story in the entire series, the short stories included). It's the detailing, which I think, had me fascinated. Ranging from Holmes's indoor target practice to the tobacco in the toe of the Persian slipper to the details of Watson's reading tastes....
Lovely post. It literally wrapped me up in the Holmes atmosphere! :)
I totally relate to your post... I had even started using the Holmes vocabulary. For e.g., "What a singular coincidence!" I would say, in my best BBC accent. Detectives come and go, but give me Sherlock Holmes anyday.
@ bjkdy
hmm...what about the old drunkard who returned every night to announce that he'd never return again?
@ shruthi
:) "Elementary, my dear Watson", the nonexistent one, has stolen the thunder of many other phrases that are more authentic. Some are...lesser known yet immortal: "To Sherlock Holmes she is always the woman"..."Come, come, it is human to err..."
@ nandu
You're right, i think it is indeed the detailing which makes them special...The baying of the hound, the phosphorescence of the eyes...Watson's first person narrative also helps us, I think, by immersing us in the scene and plot...The few stories where alternatives have been tried haven't really worked out.
@ bjkdy
Tell me more...I'm unimaginably far away from where I grew up. Where on that street are you, what's to the left, what's to the right?
sigh...what does one say?
It is impossible to say just what I mean!
But as if a magic lantern threw the nerves in patterns on a screen
Would it have been worth while
If one, settling a pillow or throwing off a shawl,
And turning toward the window, should say:
“That is not it at all,
That is not what I meant, at all.”
The love song is, for me, among other things, about being at the threshold of action, the threshold of utterance, and being defeated yet... But why "just fantastically simple words"?
Good to see the old doctor celebrated here, Sir!
Unlike most others, I fell in love with the non-Holmes part of Doyle first. He writes wonderful tales of mystery and intrigue... And I particularly remember a Professor Challenger series which has contributed seed-ideas for many later works including Jurassic Park...
@ bjkdy
I remember only the muslim lawyer and his family, and they weren't all that quiet...I wrote something eight years back about the smell of mutton in their corridors, held
back by the purdah, released when shabby children poured out: like most things from my adolescence, it's fallen away somewhere. Do you go to the ABC park? I don't remember the marwaris though. I only know those with roles: the old man, the fool, the corriander ajji, the kapali stores man with a damaged eye, the smart young poor priest from rammandir...lingayat family, bram family, all walking in slow motion, bored, doing ordniary things...
@ Atticus
We shall rely on you good sir to tell us more about Doyle when you are back :) I shall order an FTGFOP and there will still be two cups in the pot, the first warm and the second cold, by the time you get there.
@ bjkdy
where have your comments dissapeared, my friend?
Aye, some day, but my story is quite complicated...some day. let me know how I can let you know.
Post a Comment